To ΕΔΑΔ εξέδωσε σήμερα την απόφασή του στην υπόθεση Giuliani and Gaggio v. Italy. Η υπόθεση αφορούσε στη δολοφονία του νεαρού διαδηλωτή στη διάρκεια των διαδηλώσεων του 2001 στη Γένοβα εναντίον των G-8.
Η περίληψη έχει ως εξής:
In today’s Grand Chamber judgment in the case Giuliani and Gaggio v. Italy (application no. 23458/02) - which concerned the death of the applicants’ son and brother, Carlo Giuliani, during clashes at the G8 summit held in Genoa from 19 to 21 July 2001 and which is final1 - the European Court of Human Rights held:
By 13 votes to four, that there had been no violation of Article 2 (right to life) of the European Convention on Human Rights with regard to the use of lethal force;
By ten votes to seven, that there had been no violation of Article 2 with regard to the domestic legislative framework governing the use of lethal force or with regard to the weapons issued to the law-enforcement agencies at the G8 summit in Genoa;
By ten votes to seven, that there had been no violation of Article 2 with regard to the organisation and planning of the policing operations at the G8 summit in Genoa;
By ten votes to seven, that there had been no violation of Article 2 with regard to the alleged lack of an effective investigation into the death;
Unanimously, that it was not necessary to examine the case under Article 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment) or Article 6 (right to a fair hearing);
By 13 votes to four, that there had been no violation of Article 13 (right to an effective remedy);
Unanimously, that there had been no violation of Article 38 (adversarial examination of the case).
By 13 votes to four, that there had been no violation of Article 2 (right to life) of the European Convention on Human Rights with regard to the use of lethal force;
By ten votes to seven, that there had been no violation of Article 2 with regard to the domestic legislative framework governing the use of lethal force or with regard to the weapons issued to the law-enforcement agencies at the G8 summit in Genoa;
By ten votes to seven, that there had been no violation of Article 2 with regard to the organisation and planning of the policing operations at the G8 summit in Genoa;
By ten votes to seven, that there had been no violation of Article 2 with regard to the alleged lack of an effective investigation into the death;
Unanimously, that it was not necessary to examine the case under Article 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment) or Article 6 (right to a fair hearing);
By 13 votes to four, that there had been no violation of Article 13 (right to an effective remedy);
Unanimously, that there had been no violation of Article 38 (adversarial examination of the case).
Το πλήρες κείμενο της απόφασης είναι εδώ.
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου